Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917097›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Psychometric Properties of the Proxy-Reported Life-Space Assessment in Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS-Proxy) for Older Persons with and without Cognitive Impairment.

Klaus Hauer, Phoebe Ullrich, Patrick Heldmann, Laura Bauknecht, Saskia Hummel, Bastian Abel, Juergen M Bauer, Sarah E Lamb, Christian Werner

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Klaus HauerAgaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, and Center of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Phoebe UllrichAgaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, and Center of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick HeldmannNetwork Aging Research (NAR), Heidelberg University, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Laura BauknechtMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Saskia HummelMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Bastian AbelAgaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, and Center of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-5230
Juergen M BauerAgaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, and Center of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah E LambInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-7195
Christian WernerAgaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, and Center of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0679-3227
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Life-space mobility assessments for institutionalized settings are scarce and there is a lack of comprehensive validation and focus on persons with cognitive impairment (CI). This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings by proxy informants (LSA-IS-proxy) for institutionalized, older persons, with and without CI. (2) Methods: Concurrent validity against the self-reported version of the LSA-IS, construct validity with established construct variables, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change during early multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation treatment, and feasibility (completion rate, floor/ceiling effects) of the LSA-IS-proxy, were assessed in 94 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.3 ± 6.1 years), with and without CI. (3) Results: The LSA-IS-proxy total score showed good-to-excellent agreement with the self-reported LSA-IS (Intraclass Correlations Coefficient, ICC

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesassessmentclinical trial methodscognitive impairmentexercisehospitalizationlife-space mobilityphysical activityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID33917097
PMCPMC8067867
OpenAlexW3148949565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.