Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917051›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Web Survey to Evaluate the Thermal Stress Associated with Personal Protective Equipment among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

Alessandro Messeri, Michela Bonafede, Emma Pietrafesa, Iole Pinto, Francesca de'Donato, Alfonso Crisci, Jason Kai Wei Lee, Alessandro Marinaccio, Miriam Levi, Marco Morabito and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro MesseriInstitute of Bioeconomy, National Research Council (IBE-CNR), 50019 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8220-811X
Michela BonafedeOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-8136
Emma PietrafesaOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy.
Iole PintoPhysical Agents Sector, Regional Public Health Laboratory, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Francesca de'DonatoDepartment of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service, ASL ROMA 1, 00147 Rome, Italy.
Alfonso CrisciInstitute of Bioeconomy, National Research Council (IBE-CNR), 50019 Florence, Italy.
Jason Kai Wei LeeHuman Potential Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4042-795X
Alessandro MarinaccioOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-2137
Miriam LeviEpidemiology Unit, Department of Prevention, Central Tuscany Local Health Authority, 50135 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0086-3952
Marco MorabitoInstitute of Bioeconomy, National Research Council (IBE-CNR), 50019 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8799-4866
On Behalf Of The Worklimate Collaborative Group
Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro · ITNational Research Council · ITAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

WORKLIMATE- Italian Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL) in the field of BRIC 2019 B14I19003320005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic has been afflicting the planet for over a year and from the occupational point of view, healthcare workers have recorded a substantial increase in working hours. The use of personal protective equipment (PPE), necessary to keep safe from COVID-19 increases the chances of overheating, especially during the summer seasons which, due to climate change, are becoming increasingly warm and prolonged. A web survey was carried out in Italy within the WORKLIMATE project during the summer and early autumn 2020. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate differences between groups. 191 questionnaires were collected (hospital doctor 38.2%, nurses 33.5%, other healthcare professionals 28.3%). The impact of PPE on the thermal stress perception declared by the interviewees was very high on the body areas directly covered by these devices (78% of workers). Workers who used masks for more than 4 h per day perceived PPE as more uncomfortable (

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal Protective EquipmentHealth PersonnelHumansItalyPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesadaptation strategyglobal warmingheat stressoccupational safety and healthPPE

Identifiers

PMID33917051
PMCPMC8067771
OpenAlexW3148238343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.