Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33916870›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Bioprinting and Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell Spheroids for a 3D Breast Cancer-Adipose Tissue Model.

Hannes Horder, Mar Guaza Lasheras, Nadine Grummel, Ali Nadernezhad, Johannes Herbig, Süleyman Ergün, Jörg Teßmar, Jürgen Groll, Ben Fabry, Petra Bauer-Kreisel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 3D bioprinting innovations: a new frontier in breast cancer research.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A vascularizedMaterials today. Bio · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannes HorderDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Mar Guaza LasherasDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Nadine GrummelDepartment of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Ali NadernezhadChair for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes HerbigChair for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Süleyman ErgünDepartment of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Jörg TeßmarChair for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7057-5369
Jürgen GrollChair for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3167-8466
Ben FabryDepartment of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Petra Bauer-KreiselDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Torsten BlunkDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 326998133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofabrication, including printing technologies, has emerged as a powerful approach to the design of disease models, such as in cancer research. In breast cancer, adipose tissue has been acknowledged as an important part of the tumor microenvironment favoring tumor progression. Therefore, in this study, a 3D-printed breast cancer model for facilitating investigations into cancer cell-adipocyte interaction was developed. First, we focused on the printability of human adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) spheroids in an extrusion-based bioprinting setup and the adipogenic differentiation within printed spheroids into adipose microtissues. The printing process was optimized in terms of spheroid viability and homogeneous spheroid distribution in a hyaluronic acid-based bioink. Adipogenic differentiation after printing was demonstrated by lipid accumulation, expression of adipogenic marker genes, and an adipogenic ECM profile. Subsequently, a breast cancer cell (MDA-MB-231) compartment was printed onto the adipose tissue constructs. After nine days of co-culture, we observed a cancer cell-induced reduction of the lipid content and a remodeling of the ECM within the adipose tissues, with increased fibronectin, collagen I and collagen VI expression. Together, our data demonstrate that 3D-printed breast cancer-adipose tissue models can recapitulate important aspects of the complex cell-cell and cell-matrix interplay within the tumor-stroma microenvironment.

Indexed as

BioprintingCell DifferentiationModels, BiologicalAdipogenesisAdipose TissueBreast NeoplasmsCell SurvivalExtracellular MatrixFemaleHumansHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalSpheroids, CellularStromal CellsHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsadipose-derived stromal cellsadipose tissuebioprintingbreast cancer modelextracellular matrixhyaluronic acidspheroids

Identifiers

PMID33916870
PMCPMC8066030
OpenAlexW3151728836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.