Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33916850›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Review of Recent Deep Learning Approaches in Human-Centered Machine Learning.

Tharindu Kaluarachchi, Andrew Reis, Suranga Nanayakkara

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tharindu KaluarachchiAugmented Human Lab, Auckland Bioengineering Institue, The University of Auckland, 70 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-231X
Andrew ReisAugmented Human Lab, Auckland Bioengineering Institue, The University of Auckland, 70 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Suranga NanayakkaraAugmented Human Lab, Auckland Bioengineering Institue, The University of Auckland, 70 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7441-5493

Funding

New Zealand Government 3716751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After Deep Learning (DL) regained popularity recently, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Learning (ML) field is undergoing rapid growth concerning research and real-world application development. Deep Learning has generated complexities in algorithms, and researchers and users have raised concerns regarding the usability and adoptability of Deep Learning systems. These concerns, coupled with the increasing human-AI interactions, have created the emerging field that is Human-Centered Machine Learning (HCML). We present this review paper as an overview and analysis of existing work in HCML related to DL. Firstly, we collaborated with field domain experts to develop a working definition for HCML. Secondly, through a systematic literature review, we analyze and classify 162 publications that fall within HCML. Our classification is based on aspects including contribution type, application area, and focused human categories. Finally, we analyze the topology of the HCML landscape by identifying research gaps, highlighting conflicting interpretations, addressing current challenges, and presenting future HCML research opportunities.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningDeep LearningHCAIHCMLhuman-centered artificial intelligencehuman-centered machine learning

Identifiers

PMID33916850
PMCPMC8038476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.