Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33916754›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Redundancy Metric Set within Possibility Theory for Multi-Sensor Systems.

Christoph-Alexander Holst, Volker Lohweg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Strategy maintenance in smart healthcare systems.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoph-Alexander HolstinIT-Institute Industrial IT, Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Campusallee 6, 32657 Lemgo, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-7036
Volker LohweginIT-Institute Industrial IT, Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Campusallee 6, 32657 Lemgo, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3325-7887

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01IS18041D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In intelligent technical multi-sensor systems, information is often at least partly redundant-either by design or inherently due to the dynamic processes of the observed system. If sensors are known to be redundant, (i) information processing can be engineered to be more robust against sensor failures, (ii) failures themselves can be detected more easily, and (iii) computational costs can be reduced. This contribution proposes a metric which quantifies the degree of redundancy between sensors. It is set within the possibility theory. Information coming from sensors in technical and cyber-physical systems are often imprecise, incomplete, biased, or affected by noise. Relations between information of sensors are often only spurious. In short, sensors are not fully reliable. The proposed metric adopts the ability of possibility theory to model incompleteness and imprecision exceptionally well. The focus is on avoiding the detection of spurious redundancy. This article defines redundancy in the context of possibilistic information, specifies requirements towards a redundancy metric, details the information processing, and evaluates the metric qualitatively on information coming from three technical datasets.

Indexed as

information fusionmulti-sensor systemspossibility theoryredundancy analysis

Identifiers

PMID33916754
PMCPMC8038366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.