Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33916236›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Dose-Dependent Physiological and Transcriptomic Responses of Lettuce (

Tiantian Xiong, Shasha Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Kang, Ting Zhang, Shaoshan Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A review on transcriptomic and metabolomic responses of plants to nanopollution.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tiantian XiongKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Science in Guangdong Higher Education, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Shasha ZhangKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Science in Guangdong Higher Education, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Zhuangzhuang KangKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Science in Guangdong Higher Education, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Ting ZhangKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Science in Guangdong Higher Education, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Shaoshan LiKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Science in Guangdong Higher Education, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8352-3832
South China Normal University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Colleges and Schools Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme 2012National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071618National Natural Science Foundation of China 41701572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the complex mechanisms involved in plant response to nanoparticles (NPs) is indispensable in assessing the environmental impact of nano-pollutants. Plant leaves can directly intercept or absorb NPs deposited on their surface; however, the toxicity mechanisms of NPs to plant leaves are unclear. In this study, lettuce leaves were exposed to copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs, 0, 100, and 1000 mg/L) for 15 days, then physiological tests and transcriptomic analyses were conducted to evaluate the negative impacts of CuO-NPs. Both physiological and transcriptomic results demonstrated that CuO-NPs adversely affected plant growth, photosynthesis, and enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and antioxidant system activity. The comparative transcriptome analysis showed that 2270 and 4264 genes were differentially expressed upon exposure to 100 and 1000 mg/L CuO-NPs. Gene expression analysis suggested the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family, heavy metal-associated isoprenylated plant proteins (HIPPs), endocytosis, and other metal ion binding proteins or channels play significant roles in CuO-NP accumulation by plant leaves. Furthermore, the variation in antioxidant enzyme transcript levels (

Indexed as

AntioxidantsCell WallCopperLactucaMetal NanoparticlesPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesTranscriptomeAntioxidantsCoppercupric oxideCuO-NPsfoliar exposureoxidative stressphotosynthesistranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33916236
PMCPMC8036535
OpenAlexW3152076342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.