Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33916177›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Recent Developments in Nanomedicine for Pediatric Cancer.

Shicheng Yang, Mia Wallach, Apurva Krishna, Raushan Kurmasheva, Srinivas Sridhar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. LncRNA MAFG-AS1 is involved in human cancer progression.European journal of medical research · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nanomedicine Therapies for Pediatric Diseases.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shicheng YangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Mia WallachSchool of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3828-3769
Apurva KrishnaDepartment of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Raushan KurmashevaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3212-2363
Srinivas SridharDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Northeastern University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

CaNCURE: Cancer Nanomedicine Co-ops For Undergraduate Research ExperiencesR25CA174650 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SRINIVAS SRIDHAR · 2014 to 2026
$3.4M
Army Breast Cancer Research Program W81XWH-16-1-0731Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute at the University of Texas Health at San AntonioNCI NIH HHS R25 CA174650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is the second biggest cause of death in children in the US. With the development of chemotherapy, there has been a substantial increase in the overall survival rate in the last 30 years. However, the overall mortality rate in children with cancer remains 25%, and many survivors experience a decline in overall quality of life and long-term adverse effects caused by treatments. Although cancer cells share common characteristics, pediatric cancers are different from adult cancers in their prevalence, mutation load, and drug response. Therefore, there is an urgent unmet need to develop therapeutic approaches specifically designed for children with cancer. Nanotechnology can potentially overcome the deficiencies of conventional methods of administering chemotherapy and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. The nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems can decrease the toxicity of therapy, provide a sustained or controlled drug release, improve the pharmacokinetic properties of loading contents, and achieve a targeted drug delivery with achievable modifications. Furthermore, therapeutic approaches based on combining nanoformulated drugs with novel immunotherapeutic agents are emerging. In this review, we discussed the recently developed nanotechnology-based strategies for treating blood and solid pediatric cancers.

Indexed as

blood–brain barrierdrug delivery systemEwing sarcomagliomaleukemialiposomelymphomananoparticlesosteosarcomapediatric cancer

Identifiers

PMID33916177
PMCPMC8036287
OpenAlexW3144753812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.