Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33915837›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Impact of Collection Volume and DNA Extraction Method on the Detection of Biomarkers and HPV DNA in First-Void Urine.

Laura Téblick, Severien Van Keer, Annemie De Smet, Pierre Van Damme, Michelle Laeremans, Alejandra Rios Cortes, Koen Beyers, Vanessa Vankerckhoven, Veerle Matheeussen, Renee Mandersloot and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Urine human papillomavirus testing for cervical screening in a UK general screening population: a diagnostic test accuracy study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura TéblickCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7484-0956
Severien Van KeerCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.
Annemie De SmetCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.
Pierre Van DammeCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.
Michelle LaeremansNovosanis nv, 2110 Wijnegem, Belgium.
Alejandra Rios CortesNovosanis nv, 2110 Wijnegem, Belgium.
Koen BeyersNovosanis nv, 2110 Wijnegem, Belgium.
Vanessa VankerckhovenCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.
Veerle MatheeussenDepartment of Microbiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem-Antwerp, Belgium.
Renee ManderslootSelf-Screen B.V, 1098 RX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arno FlooreSelf-Screen B.V, 1098 RX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris J L M MeijerSelf-Screen B.V, 1098 RX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renske D M SteenbergenAmsterdam UMC, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-9839
Alex VorstersCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0265-058X
University of Antwerp · BEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Eurostars 12396Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1240220N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of first-void (FV) urine as a non-invasive liquid biopsy for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and other biomarkers has been increasingly recognized over the past decade. In this study, we investigated whether the volume of this initial urine stream has an impact on the analytical performance of biomarkers. In parallel, we evaluated different DNA extraction protocols and introduced an internal control in the urine preservative. Twenty-five women, diagnosed with high-risk HPV, provided three home-collected FV urine samples using three FV urine collection devices (Colli-Pee) with collector tubes that differ in volume (4, 10, 20 mL). Each collector tube was prefilled with Urine Conservation Medium spiked with phocine herpesvirus 1 (PhHV-1) DNA as internal control. Five different DNA extraction protocols were compared, followed by PCR for GAPDH and PhHV-1 (qPCR), HPV DNA, and HBB (HPV-Risk Assay), and ACTB (methylation-specific qPCR). Results showed limited effects of collection volume on human and HPV DNA endpoints. In contrast, significant variations in yield for human endpoints were observed for different DNA extraction methods (

Indexed as

BiomarkersDNA, ViralMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPapillomaviridaeAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityWorkflowYoung AdultBiomarkersDNA, Viralcervical cancerextractionsfirst-void urinegenotypingHPVhuman papillomavirusoptimizationself-sampling

Identifiers

PMID33915837
PMCPMC8036936
OpenAlexW3149423411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.