Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33915534›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2021

Evidence-Based Digital Tools for Weight Loss Maintenance: The NoHoW Project.

R James Stubbs, Cristiana Duarte, António L Palmeira, Falko F Sniehotta, Graham Horgan, Sofus C Larsen, Marta M Marques, Elizabeth H Evans, Miikka Ermes, Marja Harjumaa and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

R James StubbsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, r.j.stubbs@leeds.ac.uk.
Cristiana DuarteSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
António L PalmeiraInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Falko F SniehottaPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Graham HorganBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland (James Hutton Institute), Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Sofus C LarsenResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Marta M MarquesTrinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation and ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Elizabeth H EvansPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Miikka ErmesVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Marja HarjumaaVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Jake TuricchiSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Ruari O'DriscollSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sarah E ScottSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Beth PearsonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Lauren RamseySchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Elina MattilaVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Marcela MatosCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Paul SacherChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Euan WoodwardEuropean Association for the Study of Obesity, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Marie-Louise MikkelsenResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Kirby SainsburyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Inês SantosInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jorge EncantadoInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carol StalkerCollege of Life and Natural Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
Pedro J TeixeiraInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Berit Lilienthal HeitmannResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective interventions and commercial programmes for weight loss (WL) are widely available, but most people regain weight. Few effective WL maintenance (WLM) solutions exist. The most promising evidence-based behaviour change techniques for WLM are self-monitoring, goal setting, action planning and control, building self-efficacy, and techniques that promote autonomous motivation (e.g., provide choice). Stress management and emotion regulation techniques show potential for prevention of relapse and weight regain. Digital technologies (including networked-wireless tracking technologies, online tools and smartphone apps, multimedia resources, and internet-based support) offer attractive tools for teaching and supporting long-term behaviour change techniques. However, many digital offerings for weight management tend not to include evidence-based content and the evidence base is still limited. The Project: First, the project examined why, when, and how many European citizens make WL and WLM attempts and how successful they are. Second, the project employed the most up-to-date behavioural science research to develop a digital toolkit for WLM based on 2 key conditions, i.e., self-management (self-regulation and motivation) of behaviour and self-management of emotional responses for WLM. Then, the NoHoW trial tested the efficacy of this digital toolkit in adults who achieved clinically significant (≥5%) WL in the previous 12 months (initial BMI ≥25). The primary outcome was change in weight (kg) at 12 months from baseline. Secondary outcomes included biological, psychological, and behavioural moderators and mediators of long-term energy balance (EB) behaviours, and user experience, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. IMPACT: The project will directly feed results from studies on European consumer behaviour, design and evaluation of digital toolkits self-management of EB behaviours into development of new products and services for WLM and digital health. The project has developed a framework and digital architecture for interventions in the context of EB tracking and will generate results that will help inform the next generation of personalised interventions for effective self-management of weight and health.

Indexed as

MotivationWeight LossAdultBehavior TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisEnergy MetabolismHumansEmotion regulationInformation and communication technologiesMotivationObesitySelf-regulationWeight loss maintenance

Identifiers

PMID33915534
PMCPMC8255638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.