Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33915275›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Longitudinal infant fNIRS channel-space analyses are robust to variability parameters at the group-level: An image reconstruction investigation.

Liam H Collins-Jones, Robert J Cooper, Chiara Bulgarelli, Anna Blasi, Laura Katus, Samantha McCann, Luke Mason, Ebrima Mbye, Ebou Touray, Mohammed Ceesay and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Liam H Collins-JonesDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; DOT-HUB, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: liam.jones.14@ucl.ac.uk.
Robert J CooperDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; DOT-HUB, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Chiara BulgarelliDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Anna BlasiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Laura KatusCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Samantha McCannDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, UK.
Luke MasonCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London, UK.
Ebrima MbyeMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Ebou TourayMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Mohammed CeesayMRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Sophie E MooreDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, UK; MRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Sarah Lloyd-FoxCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Clare E ElwellDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
BRIGHT Study Team
University College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBBirkbeck, University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC-A760-5QX00Medical Research Council MC_U123292701Medical Research Council MC_UP_1005/1Medical Research Council MR/P012019/1Medical Research Council MR/S018425/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first 1000 days from conception to two-years of age are a critical period in brain development, and there is an increasing drive for developing technologies to help advance our understanding of neurodevelopmental processes during this time. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has enabled longitudinal infant brain function to be studied in a multitude of settings. Conventional fNIRS analyses tend to occur in the channel-space, where data from equivalent channels across individuals are combined, which implicitly assumes that head size and source-detector positions (i.e. array position) on the scalp are constant across individuals. The validity of such assumptions in longitudinal infant fNIRS analyses, where head growth is most rapid, has not previously been investigated. We employed an image reconstruction approach to analyse fNIRS data collected from a longitudinal cohort of infants in The Gambia aged 5- to 12-months. This enabled us to investigate the effect of variability in both head size and array position on the anatomical and statistical inferences drawn from the data at both the group- and the individual-level. We also sought to investigate the impact of group size on inferences drawn from the data. We found that variability in array position was the driving factor between differing inferences drawn from the data at both the individual- and group-level, but its effect was weakened as group size increased towards the full cohort size (N = 53 at 5-months, N = 40 at 8-months and N = 45 at 12-months). We conclude that, at the group sizes in our dataset, group-level channel-space analysis of longitudinal infant fNIRS data is robust to assumptions about head size and array position given the variability in these parameters in our dataset. These findings support a more widespread use of image reconstruction techniques in longitudinal infant fNIRS studies.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCerebral CortexChild DevelopmentFunctional NeuroimagingGambiaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfantLongitudinal StudiesSocial PerceptionSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredVisual PerceptionFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyImage reconstructionInfant cognitive developmentInfant functional neuroimagingLongitudinal imagingNeurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID33915275
PMCPMC8285580
OpenAlexW3159865739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.