Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33915103›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2021

The Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome: should patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen be included?

Michael A Matthay, B Taylor Thompson, Lorraine B Ware

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05948332 (Definition and Management of Right Ventricular Injury in Adult Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Support Using the Delphi Method), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05948332 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Definition and Management of Right Ventricular Injury in Adult Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Support Using the Delphi Method: A PRORVnet - Expert Consensus Statements

TypeobservationalSponsorPrashant NasaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled52ConditionsExtracorporeal Circulation, Complications, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication, Right Heart FailureArmsDelphi Rounds to generate consensus opinions among Experts
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Validation of Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms of impaired alveolar fluid clearance.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A MatthayDepartments of Medicine and Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: michael.matthay@ucsf.edu.
B Taylor ThompsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lorraine B WareDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2012 Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) provided validated support for three levels of initial arterial hypoxaemia that correlated with mortality in patients receiving ventilatory support. Since 2015, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has become widely used as an effective therapeutic support for acute respiratory failure, most recently in patients with severe COVID-19. We propose that the Berlin definition of ARDS be broadened to include patients treated with HFNO of at least 30 L/min who fulfil the other criteria for the Berlin definition of ARDS. An expanded definition would make the diagnosis of ARDS more widely applicable, allowing patients at an earlier stage of the syndrome to be recognised, independent of the need for endotracheal intubation or positive-pressure ventilation, with benefits for the testing of early interventions and the study of factors associated with the course of ARDS. We identify key questions that could be addressed in refining an expanded definition of ARDS, the implementation of which could lead to improvements in clinical practice and clinical outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory InsufficiencyEarly DiagnosisHumansOxygen Inhalation TherapyPatient SelectionSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexTime-to-Treatment

Identifiers

PMID33915103
PMCPMC8075801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.