Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33915001›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2021

Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.

K Pálsdóttir, S Fridsten, L Blomqvist, Z Alagic, D Fischerova, A Gaurilcikas, K Hasselrot, F Jäderling, A C Testa, A Sundin and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ultrasound examiners' ability to describe ovarian cancer spread using preacquired ultrasound videoclips from a selected patient sample with high prevalence of cancer spread.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Observational
  5. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound examination in preoperative pelvic staging of early-stage cervical cancer: post-hoc analysis of SENTIX study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Staging by imaging in gynecologic cancer and the role of ultrasound: an update of European joint consensus statements.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

K PálsdóttirDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
S FridstenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-6984
L BlomqvistDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Z AlagicDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
D FischerovaGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-3218
A GaurilcikasObstetrics and Gynecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
K HasselrotDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
F JäderlingDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
A C TestaDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
A SundinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section for Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
E EpsteinDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-7785
Karolinska University Hospital · SECharles University · CZDanderyds sjukhus · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate interobserver agreement for the assessment of local tumor extension in women with cervical cancer, among experienced and less experienced observers, using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsThe TVS observers were all gynecologists and consultant ultrasound specialists, six with and seven without previous experience in cervical cancer imaging. The MRI observers were five radiologists experienced in pelvic MRI and four less experienced radiology residents without previous experience in MRI of the pelvis. The less experienced TVS observers and all MRI observers underwent a short basic training session in the assessment of cervical tumor extension, while the experienced TVS observers received only a written directive. All observers were assigned the same images from cervical cancer patients at all stages (n = 60) and performed offline evaluation to answer the following three questions: (1) Is there a visible primary tumor? (2) Does the tumor infiltrate > ⅓ of the cervical stroma? and (3) Is there parametrial invasion? Interobserver agreement within the four groups of observers was assessed using Fleiss kappa (κ) with 95% CI.

resultsExperienced and less experienced TVS observers, respectively, had moderate interobserver agreement with respect to tumor detection (κ (95% CI), 0.46 (0.40-0.53) and 0.46 (0.41-0.52)), stromal invasion > ⅓ (κ (95% CI), 0.45 (0.38-0.51) and 0.53 (0.40-0.58)) and parametrial invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.57 (0.51-0.64) and 0.44 (0.39-0.50)). Experienced MRI observers had good interobserver agreement with respect to tumor detection (κ (95% CI), 0.70 (0.62-0.78)), while less experienced MRI observers had moderate agreement (κ (95% CI), 0.51 (0.41-0.62)), and both experienced and less experienced MRI observers, respectively, had good interobserver agreement regarding stromal invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.80 (0.72-0.88) and 0.71 (0.61-0.81)) and parametrial invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.69 (0.61-0.77) and 0.71 (0.61-0.81)).

conclusionsWe found interobserver agreement for the assessment of local tumor extension in patients with cervical cancer to be moderate for TVS and moderate-to-good for MRI. The level of interobserver agreement was associated with experience among TVS observers only for parametrial invasion. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

AdultCervix UteriClinical CompetenceFemaleGynecologyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingObserver VariationRadiologyReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginaMRIneoplasm stagingobserver variationultrasonographyuterine cervical neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID33915001
PMCPMC8597592
OpenAlexW3159747067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.