Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914872›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2021

Integrated dominance mechanisms regulate reproductive architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus.

Catriona H Walker, Cara D Wheeldon, Tom Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catriona H WalkerFaculty of Biological Sciences,School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Cara D WheeldonFaculty of Biological Sciences,School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Tom BennettFaculty of Biological Sciences,School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-4019

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011151/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R00398X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of seed in flowering plants is complicated by the need to first invest in reproductive shoots, inflorescences, flowers, and fruit. Furthermore, in many species, it will be months between plants generating flowers and setting seed. How can plants therefore produce an optimal seed-set relative to environmental resources when the "reproductive architecture" that supports seed-set needs to be elaborated so far in advance? Here, we address this question by investigating the spatio-temporal control of reproductive architecture in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Brassica napus. We show that resource and resource-related signals such as substrate volume play a key role in determining the scale of reproductive effort, and that this is reflected in the earliest events in reproductive development, which broadly predict the subsequent reproductive effort. We show that a series of negative feedbacks both within and between developmental stages prevent plants from over-committing to early stages of development. These feedbacks create a highly plastic, homeostatic system in which additional organs can be produced in the case of reproductive failure elsewhere in the system. We propose that these feedbacks represent an "integrated dominance" mechanism that allows resource use to be correctly sequenced between developmental stages to optimize seed set.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBrassica napusFlowersInflorescenceReproduction

Identifiers

PMID33914872
PMCPMC8331136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.