Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914762›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) as a marker for disease severity and persistent radiological abnormalities following COVID-19 infection at 12 weeks.

David T Arnold, Charmaine Donald, Max Lyon, Fergus W Hamilton, Anna J Morley, Marie Attwood, Alexandra Dipper, Shaney L Barratt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05979454 (Value of Krebs Von Den Lungen-6 Assay in Rheumatoid Artheritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05979454 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Value of Krebs Von Den Lungen-6 Assay in Rheumatoid Artheritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung DiseaseArmsKrebs von den Lungen-6 (KL6)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David T ArnoldAcademic Respiratory Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3158-7740
Charmaine DonaldDepartment of Immunology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Max LyonBristol Interstitial Lung Disease Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Fergus W HamiltonAcademic Respiratory Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Anna J MorleyAcademic Respiratory Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Marie AttwoodBristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research (BCARE), North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alexandra DipperAcademic Respiratory Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Shaney L BarrattAcademic Respiratory Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3067-7349
North Bristol NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute presentations of COVID-19 infection vary, ranging from asymptomatic carriage through to severe clinical manifestations including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Longer term sequelae of COVID-19 infection includes lung fibrosis in a proportion of patients. Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) is a mucin like glycoprotein that has been proposed as a marker of pulmonary epithelial cell injury. We sought to determine whether KL-6 was a marker of 1) the severity of acute COVID-19 infection, or 2) the persistence of symptoms/radiological abnormalities at medium term follow up.

methodsProspective single centre observational study.

resultsConvalescent KL-6 levels were available for 93 patients (male 63%, mean age 55.8 years) who attended an 12-week follow up appointment after being admitted to hospital with COVID-19. For 67 patients a baseline KL-6 result was available for comparison. There was no significant correlations between baseline KL-6 and the admission CXR severity score or clinical severity NEWS score. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the baseline KL-6 level and an initial requirement for oxygen on admission or the severity of acute infection as measured at 28 days. There was no significant difference in the 12-week KL-6 level and the presence or absence of subjective breathlessness but patients with abnormal CT scans at 12 weeks had significantly higher convalescent KL-6 levels compared to the remainder of the cohort (median 1101 IU/ml vs 409 IU/ml).

conclusionsThe association between high KL-6 levels at 12 weeks and persisting CT abnormalities (GGO/fibrosis), is a finding that requires further exploration. Whether KL-6 may help differentiate those patients with persisting dyspnoea due to complications rather than deconditioning or dysfunctional breathing alone, is an important future research question.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCOVID-19Disease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMucin-1Prospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersMUC1 protein, humanMucin-1

Identifiers

PMID33914762
PMCPMC8084211
OpenAlexW3159453502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.