Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914678›Full record

SynthesisPreventing chronic disease2021

Identifying Patient Strengths Instruments and Examining Their Relevance for Chronic Disease Management: A Systematic Review.

Deshira D Wallace, Ruchir N Karmali, Christine Kim, Ann Marie White, Kurt C Stange, Kristen Hassmiller Lich

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventing chronic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deshira D WallaceGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ruchir N KarmaliGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Christine KimGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ann Marie WhiteUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Kurt C StangeCenter for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kristen Hassmiller LichGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost health care focuses on patients' deficits to encourage behavior change. A strengths-based approach, which relies on identifying patient strengths, has great potential to facilitate behavior change for chronic disease management. Little is known about instruments used to assess patient strengths. We conducted a systematic review to identify validated instruments that assess personal strengths by using a theory elaboration approach.

methodsWe searched 8 databases including Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and PsycINFO (through July 2019) to identify peer reviewed, English-language studies that described strength-based instruments. Thereafter, we evaluated the validity and reliability of the instruments according to 18 Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust (SACMOT) criteria, and used an inductive, iterative editing process to identify constructs measured by the instruments.

resultsWe identified 26 instruments that met our inclusion criteria. The instruments were validated in various clinical and nonclinical populations. Only 4 instruments met most of the SACMOT criteria for validation. We extracted 91 unique constructs that fell into 3 domains: inner strengths (49), external strengths (13), and personality constructs (29).

conclusionA limited number of reliable and valid instruments are available to assess strengths for the adult population, particularly for clinical populations. Internal strengths can be leveraged to improve patient health; however, the development and validation of additional instruments to capture personal strengths is necessary to examine the multilevel influence of external strengths on individual behaviors and well-being.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareLanguageChronic DiseaseHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33914678
PMCPMC8091945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.