Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914342›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2021

Multidimensional trophic niche revealed by complementary approaches: Gut content, digestive enzymes, fatty acids and stable isotopes in Collembola.

Anton M Potapov, Melanie M Pollierer, Sandrine Salmon, Vladimír Šustr, Ting-Wen Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Trophic Position of the White Worm (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Responses of Soil Collembolans to Land Degradation in a Black Soil Region in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anton M PotapovA.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4456-1710
Melanie M PolliererJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1498-2362
Sandrine SalmonMuséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département Adaptations du Vivant, UMR 7179 MECADEV, Brunoy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1873-6940
Vladimír ŠustrBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-1855
Ting-Wen ChenBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9449-3034
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZMécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution · FRSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution · RUUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trophic niche differentiation may explain coexistence and shape functional roles of species. In complex natural food webs, however, trophic niche parameters depicted by single and isolated methods may simplify the multidimensional nature of consumer trophic niches, which includes feeding processes such as food choice, ingestion, digestion, assimilation and retention. Here we explore the correlation and complementarity of trophic niche parameters tackled by four complementary methodological approaches, that is, visual gut content, digestive enzyme, fatty acid and stable isotope analyses-each assessing one or few feeding processes, and demonstrate the power of method combination. Focusing on soil ecosystems, where many omnivore species with cryptic feeding habits coexist, we chose Collembola as an example. We compiled 15 key trophic niche parameters for 125 species from 40 studies. We assessed correlations among trophic niche parameters and described variation of these parameters in different Collembola species, families and across life-forms, which represent microhabitat specialisation. Correlation between trophic niche parameters was weak in 45 out of 64 pairwise comparisons, pointing at complementarity of the four methods. Jointly, the results indicated that fungal- and plant-feeding Collembola assimilate storage, rather than structural polysaccharides, and suggested bacterial feeding as a potential alternative feeding strategy. Gut content and fatty acid analyses suggested alignment between ingestion and assimilation/retention processes in fungal- and plant-feeding Collembola. From the 15 trophic niche parameters, six were related to Collembola family identity, suggesting that not all trophic niche dimensions are phylogenetically structured. Only three parameters were related to the life-forms, suggesting that species use various feeding strategies when living in the same microenvironments. Consumers can meet their nutritional needs by varying their food choices, ingestion and digestion strategies, with the connection among different feeding processes being dependent on the consumed resource and consumer adaptations. Multiple methods reveal different dimensions, together drawing a comprehensive picture of the trophic niche. Future studies applying the multidimensional trophic niche approach will allow us to trace trophic complexity and reveal niche partitioning of omnivorous species and their functional roles, especially in cryptic environments such as soils, caves, deep ocean or benthic ecosystems.

Indexed as

ArthropodsEcosystemAnimalsFatty AcidsFood ChainNitrogen IsotopesFatty AcidsNitrogen Isotopesbiomarkersdiet tracingfood websmeta-analysismethod comparisonspringtailstrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID33914342
PMCPMC8453724
OpenAlexW3159671410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.