Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914296›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021

A Phase I Clinical Trial to Assess Safety and Tolerability of Injectable Collagenase in Women with Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.

Bhuchitra Singh, Holly Sims, Irene Trueheart, Khara Simpson, Karen C Wang, Kristin Patzkowsky, Thomas Wegman, Jean-Marie Soma, Rosina Dixon, Friederike Jayes and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advancements and Emerging Therapies in the Medical Management of Uterine Fibroids: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bhuchitra SinghDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Holly SimsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Irene TrueheartDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Khara SimpsonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Karen C WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kristin PatzkowskyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas WegmanBioSpecifics Technologies Corporation, Lynbrook, NY, USA.
Jean-Marie SomaBioSpecifics Technologies Corporation, Lynbrook, NY, USA.
Rosina DixonBioSpecifics Technologies Corporation, Lynbrook, NY, USA.
Friederike JayesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Kristin VoegltineBiostatistics, Epidemiology and Data Management Core, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gayane YenokyanJohns Hopkins School of Public Health, Biostatistics Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Szu-Chi SuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Phyllis LeppertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
James H SegarsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. jsegars2@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5969-376X
Johns Hopkins University · USDuke University · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine fibroids feature excessive deposition of types I and III collagen. Previous ex vivo studies showed an FDA-approved collagenase (EN3835)-digested types I and III collagen fibers in fibroid tissues; however, collagenase had not been evaluated in vivo for effects on uterine fibroids. The objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of collagenase injection directly into uterine fibroids. This was a prospective, open label, dose escalation study. The study participants were fifteen women aged 35-50 years with symptomatic uterine fibroids planning to undergo hysterectomy. Three subjects received saline and methylene blue, three subjects received a fixed dose of EN3835, and 9 subjects received stepped, increasing dosages of EN3835, all by transvaginal, ultrasound-guided injections. Primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability of the injection and change in collagen content between treated and control tissues. There were no significant adverse events following injection of EN3835 into uterine fibroids. Masson's trichrome stains revealed a 39% reduction in collagen content in treated samples compared to controls (p <0.05). Second harmonic generation (SHG) analysis showed treated samples to have a 21% reduction in density of collagen compared to controls. Picrosirius-stained collagenase-treated fibroids showed collagen fibers to be shorter and less dense compared to controls. Subjects reported a decrease in fibroid-related pain on the McGill Pain Questionnaire after study drug injection in Group 2 at both 4-8 days and 60-90 days post-injection. The findings indicated that injection of collagenase was safe and well tolerated. These results support further clinical investigation of collagenase as a minimally invasive treatment of uterine fibroids. NCT0289848.

Indexed as

AdultBaltimoreCollagen Type ICollagen Type IIIFemaleHumansInjections, IntralesionalLeiomyomaMicrobial CollagenaseMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUterine NeoplasmsCollagen Type ICollagen Type IIIMicrobial CollagenaseClostridium histolyticumCollagenaseLeiomyomaPhase 1 studyUterine fibroids

Identifiers

PMID33914296
PMCPMC8346429
OpenAlexW3157371746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.