Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914272›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

Transoral versus gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy: a comparative study.

Guibin Zheng, Jiajie Xu, Guochang Wu, Chi Ma, Haiqing Sun, Minghua Ge, Haitao Zheng, Chuanming Zheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guibin Zheng *Department of Thyroid Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Jiajie Xu *Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
Guochang WuDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Chi MaDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Haiqing SunDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Minghua GeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
Haitao ZhengDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China. zhenghaitao1972@163.com.
Chuanming ZhengDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, 310014, China. mingdoc@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the surgical safety and outcomes of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy transaxillary approach (GETTA). This retrospective study assessed 150 patients managed with the TOETVA at the Yantai Yuhuangding hospital and 150 patients managed via the GETTA at the Zhenjiang Provincial People's Hospital. The procedures were compared in terms of workspace creation time, operating time, complications, post-operative complaints, cosmetic satisfaction, and the efficacy of central neck lymph-node dissection. There was no significant between-group difference in terms of post-operative complications. The average workspace creation and operating times were significantly shorter for GETTA than for TOETVA (P values for both < 0.001). The average number of lymph nodes dissected from the central compartment of the neck was higher in the TOETVA group than in the GETTA group (7.2 ± 4.6 vs. 3.9 ± 3.0, P < 0.001). The mean swallowing impairment index-6 scores at 1 month were significantly lower in the GETTA group than in the TOETVA group (1.5 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Over 97% of all patients (both groups) were either satisfied or very satisfied with the cervical cosmetic outcomes at 3 months post-surgery (P = 0.099). TOETVA and GETTA are both safe procedures with good cervical cosmetic outcomes for well-selected patients. Although TOETVA is more efficacious in terms of central lymph nodes dissection, GETTA has a greater time-cost advantage.

Indexed as

ThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsEndoscopyHumansNeck DissectionRetrospective StudiesCentral node dissectionCervical cosmetic outcomesGasless transaxillary approachTransoral vestibular approach

Identifiers

PMID33914272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.