Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914260›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2021

Novel Strategies to Combat Bacterial Biofilms.

Fatemeh Hemmati, Mohammad Ahangarzadeh Rezaee, Saba Ebrahimzadeh, Leila Yousefi, Roghayeh Nouri, Hossein Samadi Kafil, Pourya Gholizadeh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Infection and drug resistance · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Interference ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Advances of Antimicrobial Peptides in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Fluoroquinolones and Biofilm: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Inhibition ofmSphere · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Anti-Biofilm Effects of Z102-E ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh HemmatiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Ahangarzadeh RezaeeImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Saba EbrahimzadehDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Leila YousefiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Roghayeh NouriStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hossein Samadi KafilDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Pourya GholizadehDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. poorya.gholizadeh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-3996
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUrmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are considered as a severe problem in the treatment of bacterial infections; their development causes some noticeable resistance to antibacterial agents. Biofilms are responsible for at least two-thirds of all infections, displaying promoted resistance to classical antibiotic treatments. Therefore, finding new alternative therapeutic approaches is essential for the treatment and inhibition of biofilm-related infections. Therefore, this review aims to describe the potential therapeutic strategies that can inhibit bacterial biofilm development; these include the usage of antiadhesion agents, AMPs, bacteriophages, QSIs, aptamers, NPs and PNAs, which can prevent or eradicate the formation of biofilms. These antibiofilm agents represent a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of biofilm infections and development of a strong capability to interfere with different phases of the biofilm development, including adherence, polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA), quorum sensing molecules and cell-to-cell connection, bacterial aggregation, planktonic bacteria killing and host-immune response modulation. In addition, these components, in combination with antibiotics, can lead to the development of some kind of powerful combined therapy against bacterial biofilm-related infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial AdhesionBacterial InfectionsBiofilmsHumansQuorum SensingAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiofilm agentsBiofilmBiofilm-related infectionsTherapeutic approaches

Identifiers

PMID33914260
OpenAlexW3158988592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.