ArticleEJNMMI physics2021
Population-based input function for TSPO quantification and kinetic modeling with [
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-Body Dynamic Positron Emission and Computed Tomography (WBD-PET/CT): Latest Developments, Challenges and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- TSPO circadian pattern: a test-retest study of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- DOCK-PET: database of CNS kinetic parameters in the healthy human brain for existing PET tracers.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Patient-Adaptive Population-Based Modeling of Arterial Input Functions.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2023Article
- Tracers progress for positron emission tomography imaging of glial-related disease.Journal of biomedical research · 2022Article
- DynamicRadiology. Imaging cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionQuantitative positron emission tomography (PET) studies of neurodegenerative diseases typically require the measurement of arterial input functions (AIF), an invasive and risky procedure. This study aims to assess the reproducibility of [ MATERIALS AND
methodsEighteen subjects including six healthy volunteers (HV) and twelve Parkinson disease (PD) subjects from two [
resultsBland-Altman analysis showed systematic bias between test and retest studies. The corresponding mean bias and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for the studied brain regions were 30% and ± 70%. Comparing PBIF- and PSAIF-based V
conclusionsPSAIF kinetic results are reproducible with PBIF, with variability in V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.