ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021
Solid-phase optimisation for simultaneous determination of thirteen pharmaceuticals in Ethiopian water samples with HPLC-DAD detection: an initial assessment.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Emerging Threat of Antibiotic Residues in the Aquatic Environments of East Africa: A Systematic Review.Environmental health insights · 2026Review
- Analytical Methods for the Determination of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Solid and Liquid Environmental Matrices: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Copper Nanoparticles and Reduced Graphene Oxide as an Electrode Modifier for the Development of an Electrochemical Sensing Platform for Chloroquine Phosphate Determination.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical consumption is increasing worldwide as it is essential to treat and prevent health issues but they end up in the environment. However, in many African countries like Ethiopia, the status of these compounds in various environmental samples is not very well known. In this study, a simple method for the extraction and determination of thirteen pharmaceutical compounds of different therapeutic classes in water samples using solid-phase extraction and HPLC-DAD was developed. Different parameters affecting extraction were optimised and obtained as hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) extraction cartridge, water sample pH of 5, elution solvent of 2% formic acid in water with methanol (20:80%, v/v), a sample volume of 150 mL and addition of 0.5% w/v EDTA in the sample. The limits of detection and quantification of the optimised method were in the range of 0.1-0.8 µg/L and 0.2-2.6 µg/L, respectively. The relative recovery in the spiked environmental water sample was in the range of 70-117% except for amoxicillin and acetylsalicylic acid in influent wastewater. The precision for all ranged from 0.3 to 11%. The proposed method was successfully tested for the detection and quantification of different environmental water samples collected from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Trimethoprim, caffeine and albendazole concentrations of 7.8 (1.1), 3.2 (0.4) and 2.1 (0.1) µg/L were quantified in hospital wastewater, respectively. The concentration of norfloxacin was found to be below the limit of quantification in the same water. Trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin were also found in the sewage treatment plant influent sample at a concentration of 0.5 (0.02) and 0.3 (0.01) µg/L, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.