Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914165›Full record

ArticlePlant reproduction2021

The evolution of imprinting in plants: beyond the seed.

Sean A Montgomery, Frédéric Berger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant reproduction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How parental factors shape the plant embryo.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Parental dialectic: Epigenetic conversations in endosperm.Current opinion in plant biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean A MontgomeryGregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1680-4858
Frédéric BergerGregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria. frederic.berger@gmi.oeaw.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-3609-8260
Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 26887Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28320Austrian Science Fund FWF P 32054Austrian Science Fund FWF P 33380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting results in the biased expression of alleles depending on if the allele was inherited from the mother or the father. Despite the prevalence of sexual reproduction across eukaryotes, imprinting is only found in placental mammals, flowering plants, and some insects, suggesting independent evolutionary origins. Numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain the selective pressures that favour the innovation of imprinted gene expression and each differs in their experimental support and predictions. Due to the lack of investigation of imprinting in land plants, other than angiosperms with triploid endosperm, we do not know whether imprinting occurs in species lacking endosperm and with embryos developing on maternal plants. Here, we discuss the potential for uncovering additional examples of imprinting in land plants and how these observations may provide additional support for one or more existing imprinting hypotheses.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingPlantsAllelesDNA MethylationEndospermSeedsEmbryoEvolutionImprintingPlants

Identifiers

PMID33914165
PMCPMC8566399
OpenAlexW3158240336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.