ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2021
Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study.
Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational differences in sickness presenteeism in the baseline survey of the German National Cohort (NAKO).Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Candidate prognostic factors of presenteeism among French workers: an exploratory longitudinal study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Young adults with a history of depression and/or anxiety: the role of sociodemographic and health-related factors in not being sickness absent.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- Explaining presenteeism behaviour with the theory of planned behaviour - a longitudinal study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- Factors of presenteeism and its association with detrimental effects among employees in Switzerland working in different sectors - a cross-sectional study using a multi-item instrument.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Presenteeism in front-line physicians involved in COVID-19-related clinical practice: a national survey of employed physician members of the Japan Medical Association.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Cluster Headache and the Comprehension Paradox.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols.
methodA cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample (n = 6230) aged 16-64, who had been interviewed in 2015 or in 2017 for the Swedish Work Environment Surveys (SWES). The odds ratios (ORs) stratified by occupational category for reasons of presenteeism, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated using binomial multiple logistic regression analysis.
resultsThe study showed that presenteeism was more common among employees handling people (74%), when compared to employees handling things (65%) or handling symbols (70%). The most common reason for presenteeism among employees handling people was "I do not want to burden my colleagues", while "Because nobody else can carry out my responsibilities" was most common in the other two categories. After control for socio-demography, work environments and health, the differences in reasons mostly remained significant between the three occupational categories.
conclusionThe differences between occupational categories are important for prevalence and reasons for presenteeism. As presenteeism affects the future health of employees and the productivity of the work unit, attempts to reduce presenteeism may be important. Because the reasons vary between occupations, customized preventive measures should be applied in different occupational settings. Among employees handling people, covering up for absence in work team is relevant, while among employees handling symbols and handling things the corresponding focus could be on shared responsibilities for specific tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.