Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33914160›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Intravitreal metoprolol for circumscribed choroidal hemangiomas: a phase I clinical trial.

Leandro Chaves, André Messias, Zelia Correa, Rodrigo Jorge

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Safety of intravitreal metoprolol in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leandro ChavesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-4949
André MessiasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.
Zelia CorreaOcular Oncology Service, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute and Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-3757
Rodrigo JorgeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil. retinausp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-0720
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305299/2018.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChoroidal hemangioma is a visual threatening condition for which treatments is neither uniform nor widely available. New management options are necessary. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and early outcome of intravitreal metoprolol tartrate in five patients with CCH.

methodsFive eyes of five patients diagnosed with subfoveal or peripapillary CCH and unsuccessfully treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents were enrolled and received off-label intravitreal injections of metoprolol (50μg/0.05 ml). Baseline and follow-up evaluations included best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, assessment of anterior chamber cellular score/flare and vitritis, retinography, fundus autofluorescence, and ERG. Patients were followed for a period of 30 days. Statistical analysis involved comparison of pre- and post-treatment findings using a paired t-test.

resultsThere was no significant difference in all ERG parameters regarding a- and b-wave amplitude and implicit time, and oscillatory potentials' maximal amplitude. There were no significant changes in visual acuity. None of the patients developed clinical signs of intraocular inflammation. The subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid improved in 3 out of 5 patients 4 weeks after the metoprolol injection.

conclusionsPatients with CCH treated with a single injection of 50μg/0.05ml intravitreal metoprolol injections showed no signs of acute ocular toxicity. This pilot study did not assess long-term retinal toxicity, different concentrations, drug resistance, and complications from repeated-intravitreal injections.

Indexed as

Choroidal NeovascularizationChoroid NeoplasmsHemangiomaAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMetoprololPilot ProjectsTomography, Optical CoherenceAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabMetoprololChoroidElectroretinogramHemangiomaMetoprololOcular toxicityβ-blocker

Identifiers

PMID33914160
OpenAlexW3158074029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.