Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33913871›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Perspectives of physicians regarding the role of webinars on medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Annamalai Odayappan, Rengaraj Venkatesh, Raveendra Tammineni, Sivagami Nachiappan, Mani Iswarya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing Educational Impact of Worldwide Webinar on Management of Myopia Progression in Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annamalai OdayappanDepartment of Glaucoma, Aravind Eye Hospital, Pondicherry, India.
Rengaraj VenkateshChief Medical Officer, Aravind Eye Hospital, Pondicherry, India.
Raveendra TammineniHead of Department of Glaucoma, Sankar Foundation Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sivagami NachiappanResident, Indira Gandhi Government General Hospital and Post Graduate Institute, Puducherry, India.
Mani IswaryaDepartment of Biostatistics, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To understand the perspectives of physicians regarding the role of webinars on continuing medical education. Methods: An online survey comprising of 34 questions in nine sections was conducted using Google Forms. The link for the questionnaire was shared via e-mail and social media to practicing physicians. The survey accepted responses from September 10, 2020, to September 30, 2020. Results: In total, 509 ophthalmologists and 91 physicians from other specialties participated in the survey. The physicians were predominantly employed in nongovernmental institutes (25%) or were in private practice (33.2%). The preference was to attend a weekend webinar (62.8%), in the evening (52.8%), not extending more than 2 hours (97.7%), by ≤3 reputed national speakers (89.8%), each given 15 to 30 minutes for their presentation, and the topic being clinical or surgical skill demonstration (47.5%) or recent advances (39.5%). The residents were perceived to be the most benefited (65.3%). There was an equal preference for watching a webinar live or recorded (50.7% vs. 49.3%). Zoom Video Communications, Inc., was described as the platform that offers the best experience (43.8%). Webinars were considered to be better than conferences or continuing medical education (CME) activities (55.8%). The majority (43.8%) also preferred to get CME credit points by attending paid webinars. However, the broad consensus was that webinars should not completely replace the conferences (42.5%). Conclusion: Our survey evaluated the participants' perspective and the advantages and the disadvantages of a webinar and provides suggestions for the conduct of an ideal webinar with maximum active participation. Future programs would greatly be benefited by this survey.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Medical educationonline teachingphysician perspectivessurveywebinar

Identifiers

PMID33913871
PMCPMC8186632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.