ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Pediatric ocular motor cranial nerve palsy: Demographics and etiological profile.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic oculomotor nerve palsy secondary to a sphenoid-cavernous sinus lesion in an adolescent: a case report and literature review.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Oculomotor Neuritis as a Treatable Cause of Unilateral Ptosis.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Presumed Fourth Nerve Palsy in a Healthy and Asymptomatic Child with COVID-19 Infection.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2024Article
- Combined recession-resection in the management of paralytic strabismus: simplification of the complex (a case report).The Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe epidemiological and clinical characteristics of pediatric ocular motor cranial nerve palsy. Methods: This was a retrospective record-based study, carried out at a tertiary eye care hospital in India, between January 2011 and January 2015 and included patients up to 16 years of age at the time of presentation, diagnosed with third, fourth, sixth nerve palsy or a combination of these with other cranial nerve palsy. Data analyzed included demographic details, etiologies, presence or absence of amblyopia, relevant investigations, and management. Results: A total of 90 cases were included in the study. Eighty patients (88.88%) presented with isolated nerve palsy. Forty-three patients (47.77%) had congenital nerve palsy. The most common nerve involved was third (n = 35, 38.88%) followed by sixth (n = 23, 25.55%) and fourth nerve (n = 22, 24.44%). Most common cause of third and fourth cranial nerve palsy was congenital (n = 18, 51.42% and n = 17, 77.30%, respectively), while it was trauma for the sixth nerve (n = 7, 30.40%). Amblyopia was most frequently associated with third cranial nerve palsy (n = 27, 77.14%). The radio-imaging yield was maximum (n = 7, 70%) for combined cranial nerve palsy. Overall 44 (48.88%) patients were managed conservatively, while 46 (51.11%) patients needed squint with or without ptosis surgery. Conclusion: The most common ocular motor cranial nerve involved in the pediatric population was the third cranial nerve, and it was found to be the most amblyogenic in this age group. The neuroimaging yield was maximum for combined cranial nerve palsy. The most common conservatively managed nerve palsy in this study group was the fourth nerve palsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.