Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33913646›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2021

Effect of a Randomized, Controlled Trial on Surgery for Cervical Cancer.

Patrick J Lewicki, Spyridon P Basourakos, Yuqing Qiu, Jim C Hu, David Sheyn, Adonis Hijaz, Jonathan E Shoag

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MILACC study: could undetected lymph node micrometastases have impacted recurrence rate in the LACC trial?International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Learning Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Are We Facing an Emerging Situation?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Robotic surgery: getting the evidence right.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022
    Article
  16. Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick J LewickiNew York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-0692-2909
Spyridon P BasourakosNew York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-4593
Yuqing QiuWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Jim C HuNew York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
David SheynUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
Adonis HijazUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
Jonathan E ShoagUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAbdomenFemaleHumansHysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID33913646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.