Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33913597›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2021

National scale down-the-drain environmental risk assessment of oxybenzone in the United States.

Emily E Burns, Susan A Csiszar, Kyle S Roush, Iain A Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review of ultraviolet filters and their impact on aquatic environments.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily E BurnsPersonal Care Products Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-6409
Susan A CsiszarProcter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Kyle S RoushProcter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Iain A DaviesPersonal Care Products Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Procter & Gamble (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic ultraviolet (UV) filters are used in cosmetic and personal care products (CPCPs) and over-the-counter (OTC) sunscreens, due to their ability to absorb solar radiation. When OTC and CPCP ingredients are washed down the drain, they can then enter freshwaters that receive wastewater treatment plant effluents. This paper presents a freshwater environmental safety assessment of a key UV filter, oxybenzone, used in OTC sunscreens and CPCPs in the United States. Exposure was characterized using iSTREEM

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWater Pollutants, ChemicalBenzophenonesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesBenzophenonesoxybenzoneWater Pollutants, ChemicalBP-3Down-the-drain freshwater aquatic risk assessmentExposure modelingUV filters

Identifiers

PMID33913597
PMCPMC8453704
OpenAlexW3159375837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.