Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33913275›Full record

ArticleJournal of breast cancer2021

Comparison of Single Incision Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Based on Initial Experience.

Hye Yoon Lee, Young Woo Chang, Da Young Yu, Tae Yul Lee, Duk Woo Kim, Woo Young Kim, Seung Pil Jung, Sang Uk Woo, Jae Bok Lee, Gil Soo Son

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of breast cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Perioperative management of direct-to-implant-based breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients and West China Hospital experiences].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Past and present of endoscopic surgery and robotic surgery in treatment of breast diseases].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hye Yoon LeeDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-1412
Young Woo ChangDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ywoochang@korea.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5396-7467
Da Young YuDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7931-4034
Tae Yul LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6511-5453
Duk Woo KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3382-560X
Woo Young KimDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-6855
Seung Pil JungDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3967-2974
Sang Uk WooDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-4704
Jae Bok LeeDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-3097
Gil Soo SonDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-7875
Korea University · KR

Funding

Korea Breast Cancer Foundation Q1809151Korea University Ansan Hospital K1811041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndoscopic breast surgery for patients with breast cancer was introduced for its superior cosmetic outcomes; it was initially studied in the field of breast-conserving surgery and, more recently, in robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). The main purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic NSM (E-NSM) in patients with breast cancer by comparing E-NSM and conventional NSM (C-NSM).

methodsBetween May 2017 and October 2020, we retrieved the records of 45 patients who underwent NSM with permanent silicone implants and divided them into the E-NSM group (20 patients) and the C-NSM group (25 patients), depending on the use of the endoscopic device. We also analyzed demographic information, pathology, operative time, and complications.

resultsNo significant differences were observed between the 2 groups based on demographic information, postoperative pathological data, mean length of hospital stay, and total number of complications. The mean preparation time for surgery was comparable between both groups. Compared to the C-NSM group, the E-NSM group had a significantly longer mean operative time and, subsequently, a significantly longer mean total operative time and number of complications.

conclusionThe results showed that E-NSM was feasible and safe with a more inconspicuous incision in patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsEndoscopic surgical procedureMastectomyReconstructive surgeryRobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID33913275
PMCPMC8090808
OpenAlexW3156514001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.