Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33913164›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2021

A quantitative description of macaque ganglion cell responses to natural scenes: the interplay of time and space.

Manuel Schottdorf, Barry B Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TWINKLE: An open-source two-photon microscope for teaching and research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diversity of Ganglion Cell Responses to Saccade-Like Image Shifts in the Primate Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel SchottdorfMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, D-37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5468-4255
Barry B LeeGraduate Center for Vision Research, Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd St., New York, NY, 10036, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0100-5351
Princeton University · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

INFORMATION TRANSFER THROUGH RETINAL GANGLION CELLSR01EY013112 · NEI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI LEE, BARRY · 2000 to 2010
$2.6M
HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) 5R01EY013112NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsResponses to natural scenes are the business of the retina. We find primate ganglion cell responses to such scenes consistent with those to simpler stimuli. A biophysical model confirmed this and predicted ganglion cell responses with close to retinal reliability. Primate ganglion cell responses to natural scenes were driven by temporal variations in colour and luminance over the receptive field centre caused by eye movements, and little influenced by interaction of centre and surround with structure in the scene. We discuss implications in the context of efficient coding of the visual environment. Much information in a higher spatiotemporal frequency band is concentrated in the magnocellular pathway. ABSTRACT: Responses of visual neurons to natural scenes provide a link between classical descriptions of receptive field structure and visual perception of the natural environment. A natural scene video with a movement pattern resembling that of primate eye movements was used to evoke responses from macaque ganglion cells. Cell responses were well described through known properties of cell receptive fields. Different analyses converge to show that responses primarily derive from the temporal pattern of stimulation derived from eye movements, rather than spatial receptive field structure beyond centre size and position. This was confirmed using a model that predicted ganglion cell responses close to retinal reliability, with only a small contribution of the surround relative to the centre. We also found that the spatiotemporal spectrum of the stimulus is modified in ganglion cell responses, and this can reduce redundancy in the retinal signal. This is more pronounced in the magnocellular pathway, which is much better suited to transmit the detailed structure of natural scenes than the parvocellular pathway. Whitening is less important for chromatic channels. Taken together, this shows how a complex interplay across space, time and spectral content sculpts ganglion cell responses.

Indexed as

MacacaVisual FieldsAnimalsNeuronsPhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsRetinaeye movementsnatural scenesprimate visionretinal ganglion cells

Identifiers

PMID33913164
PMCPMC8998785
OpenAlexW3157996984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.