Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33912958›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2021

Unusual visual and olfactory perceptions during radiotherapy sessions: an investigation of the organs responsible.

N Hara, A Isobe, K Yamada, Y Kosugi, M Oshima, T Kawamoto, N Shikama, K Sasai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Abnormal visual and olfactory sensations during radiation therapy: a prospective study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Headache-Associated Phantosmia as a Harbinger of Lewy Body Dementia.The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. My 42-year Experience in Radiation Oncology.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N HaraDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan.
A IsobeDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan.
K YamadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Y KosugiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
M OshimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
T KawamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
N ShikamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
K SasaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPJuntendo University Hospital · JP

Funding

Juntendo University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During radiotherapy sessions to treat brain tumors or head-and-neck cancers, some patients experience unusual visual and/or olfactory perceptions. This prospective study sought to answer two questions: (i) what proportion of patients experience these unpleasant sensations?, and (ii) which organs are responsible? Eligible patients had brain or near-orbital tumors treated by helical tomotherapy. All were aged 10 years or older, able to communicate, and interviewed by a radiation oncologist at least once weekly during radiation therapy. If they had experienced such sensations, they were encouraged to join the second phase of the study. The patients were asked to indicate, using a button, when a sensation commenced and ended. The recorded data were collated with the treatment log. Thirty-eight consecutive patients were eligible. Twenty-six experienced visual and 13 olfactory sensations. The radiation doses to the organs related to the visual or olfactory sensations did not differ between patients who reported sensations and those who did not. Seventeen patients were enrolled in the second phase of the study. All 14 with visual sensations reported that the sensations occurred when the X-rays passed at eye level. Olfactory sensations were reported by eight out of nine patients when the X-rays passed through the olfactory epithelium and/or ethmoid sinus level. In conclusion, 68% of patients experienced visual sensations caused by X-rays passing through the level of the eyes, and 34% complained of olfactory sensations. With the exception of one patient, olfactory sensations occurred when the X-rays passed through the levels of the olfactory epithelium and/or ethmoid sinus.

Indexed as

Organ SpecificityRadiotherapyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOlfactory PerceptionRadiometryVisual PerceptionYoung Adultbrain tumorolfactory perceptionphantosmiaphospheneradiationvisual sensation

Identifiers

PMID33912958
PMCPMC8273799
OpenAlexW3158271813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.