Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33912826›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2021

Analysis of immune responses to attenuated alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 formulated with and without adjuvant.

George C Russell, David M Haig, Mark P Dagleish, Helen Todd, Ann Percival, Dawn M Grant, Jackie Thomson, Anna E Karagianni, Julio Benavides

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

George C RussellMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
David M HaigSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK.
Mark P DagleishMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
Helen ToddMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
Ann PercivalMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
Dawn M GrantMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
Jackie ThomsonMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
Anna E KaragianniMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
Julio BenavidesMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian EH26 0PZ, UK.
Moredun Research Institute · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experimental vaccine for bovine malignant catarrhal fever consists of viable attenuated alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1) derived by extensive culture passage, combined with an oil-in-water adjuvant, delivered intramuscularly. This immunisation strategy was over 80% effective in previous experimental and field trials and protection appeared to be associated with induction of virus-neutralising antibodies. Whether the vaccine virus is required to be viable at the point of immunisation and whether adjuvant is required to induce the appropriate immune responses remains unclear. To address these issues two studies were performed, firstly to analyse immune responses in the presence and absence of adjuvant and secondly, to investigate immune responses to vaccines containing adjuvant plus viable or inactivated AlHV-1. The first study showed that viable attenuated AlHV-1 in the absence of adjuvant induced virus-specific antibodies but the titres of virus-neutralising antibodies were significantly lower than those induced by vaccine containing viable virus and adjuvant, suggesting adjuvant was required for optimal responses. In contrast, the second study found that the vaccine containing inactivated (>99.9%) AlHV-1 induced similar levels of virus-neutralising antibody to the equivalent formulation containing viable AlHV-1. Together these studies suggest that the MCF vaccine acts as an antigen depot for induction of immune responses, requiring adjuvant and a suitable antigen source, which need not be viable virus. These observations may help in directing the development of alternative MCF vaccine formulations for distribution in the absence of an extensive cold chain.

Indexed as

AntibodyAntigenEmulsigenInactivationMalignant catarrhal feverVaccine

Identifiers

PMID33912826
PMCPMC8065228
OpenAlexW3136725266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.