Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33912710›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Analyzing the evolution of technostress: A science mapping approach.

Cristian Salazar-Concha, Pilar Ficapal-Cusí, Joan Boada-Grau, Luis J Camacho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Holistic Investigation of the Relationship between Digital Addiction and Academic Achievement among Students.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain - a systematic review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristian Salazar-ConchaAdministration Institute, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Independencia 631, Valdivia 5110566, Chile.
Pilar Ficapal-CusíFaculty of Economics and Business, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Av. Tibidabo, 39-43, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan Boada-GrauFaculty of Education Sciences and Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Ctra Valls, S/n, 43007, Tarragona, Spain.
Luis J CamachoDivision of Business, Department of International Business and Marketing, SUNY Empire State College, 500 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper analyzes the scientific map of technostress and the scientific production on this topic between 1982 and 2017, highlighting its structure, evolution, and trends in this field. A literature review based on bibliometric analysis of 246 records indexed in Scopus database was conducted. These publications were analyzed according to bibliometric indicators and through science maps with SciMAT. Co-occurrence of terms by grouping techniques was implemented. In addition, elaboration of maps of science and performance analysis for periods was executed. The main contribution of this work is to provide the first scientific map of technostress and a detailed understanding of the scientific production that predicts the directions of future research. The bibliometric analyses permit an overview of the growth, extent and distribution of the scientific literature related to the technostress and the study of the scientific production of an institution, country, author or research group.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisBibliometric indicatorsScience mappingSciMatTechnostress

Identifiers

PMID33912710
PMCPMC8065288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.