ArticleFrontiers in public health2021
Societal Impacts of Pandemics: Comparing COVID-19 With History to Focus Our Response.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) excess mortality outcomes associated with pandemic effects study (COPES): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Evolutionary trends of plague research from 2016 to 2025: A bibliometric analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Transferable learning from pandemic experiences: impacts, adaptations and capacity for resilience within households, communities and organisations.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Mental Health Needs of Families of Patients in Intensive Care Units and the Role of Mobile Health: Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- "No data, no problem"? A critical reflection of health monitoring systems and equity during COVID-19 in Finland.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Social long COVID: impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on public health and policy in Brazil.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Quantitative and Structural Antimicrobial Activity of Thymol, Terpinen-4-ol, Citral, and E-2-Dodecenal, Antibiotic Molecules Derived from Essential Oils.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Black Death of 1348 in Florence and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in the 650Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- The Ethical Principles in Ethical Guidance Documents during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland: A Qualitative Review.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2024Review
- Pandemics: past, present, and future: multitasking challenges in need of cross-disciplinary, transdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary collaborative solutions.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2024Article
- A Comparative Study of the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Mental Health, Healthcare Access, and Pain Levels of Patients with Chronic Pain from Spring 2020 to Spring 2021.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Paradoxical experiences of healthcare workers during COVID-19: a qualitative analysis of anonymous, web-based, audio narratives.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Acute Myocarditis and Pericarditis After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinations-A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis.Heart, lung & circulation · 2023Article
- Agent-based social simulations for health crises response: utilising the everyday digital health perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Who is essential in care? Reflections from the pandemic's backstage.Nursing ethics · 2022Article
- The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic on oral medicine practice.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2022Article
- Otolaryngology in the face of A pandemic.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 has disrupted everyday life worldwide and is the first disease event since the 1918 H1N1 Spanish influenza (flu) pandemic to demand an urgent global healthcare response. There has been much debate on whether the damage of COVID-19 is due predominantly to the pathogen itself or our response to it. We compare SARS-CoV-2 against three other major pandemics (1347 Black Death, 1520's new world smallpox outbreaks, and 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic) over the course of 700 years to unearth similarities and differences in pathogen, social and medical context, human response and behavior, and long-term social and economic impact that should be used to shape COVID-19 decision-making. We conclude that <100 years ago, pandemic disease events were still largely uncontrolled and unexplained. The extensive damage wreaked by historical pandemics on health, economy, and society was a function of pathogen characteristics and lack of public health resources. Though there remain many similarities in patterns of disease spread and response from 1300 onwards, the major risks posed by COVID-19 arise not from the pathogen, but from indirect effects of control measures on health and core societal activities. Our understanding of the epidemiology and effective treatment of this virus has rapidly improved and attention is shifting toward the identification of long-term control strategies that balance consideration of health in at risk populations, societal behavior, and economic impact. Policymakers should use lessons from previous pandemics to develop appropriate risk assessments and control plans for now-endemic COVID-19, and for future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.