ArticleProstate international2021
Impact of the evolving United States Preventative Services Task Force policy statements on incidence and distribution of prostate cancer over 15 years in a statewide cancer registry.
Article in Prostate international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening policy changes and prostate cancer epidemiology: 20-year trends in diagnosis, treatment, incidence, and mortality.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Trends in prostate cancer incidence among Black men in the Caribbean and the United States.The Prostate · 2023Article
- Detection of recurrence sites usingProstate international · 2023Article
- Opportunities for Achieving the Cancer Moonshot Goal of a 50% Reduction in Cancer Mortality by 2047.Cancer discovery · 2023Article
- Health Burdens and SES in Alabama: Using Geographic Information System to Examine Prostate Cancer Health Disparity.Cancers · 2022Article
- Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations.BMC urology · 2022Article
- Association of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening With Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- US Cancer Screening Recommendations: Developments and the Impact of COVID-19.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guideline on Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening evolved both in 2008 (Grade I for men < 75 years and Grade D for men > 75 years) and in 2012 (Grade D for all ages). MATERIALS AND
methodsA statewide cancer registry operated by the Pennsylvania Department of Health was accessed to analyze over a 15-year period prostate cancer rates across different categories including age, stage, and geographic distribution.
resultsLocal prostate cancer rates decreased significantly when comparing before and after USPSTF's guideline changes: 2002-2008 vs. 2009-2012 vs. 2013-2016 (p < 0.005). Conversely, the distant cancer rates increased significantly in Caucasian men (but not in African American men) (p = 0.0078). In age group analysis, distant cancer rates increased significantly in all age ranges, most notably in younger men (50-59 years). No observed difference in the trend of distant cancer rates when considering rural versus urban counties.
conclusionsIncident prostate cancer cases diagnosed in Pennsylvania have decreased over the past 15 years with a recent rise in distant carcinomas potentially attributable to the USPSTF recommendations against PSA-based screening. Although the USPSTF revised their PSA-based prostate cancer screening guideline in 2018 (Grade C for men 55-69 years and Grade D for men > 70 years), the implications of the aforementioned observations on mortality outcomes merit further follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.