Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33912451›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of E-Cadherin in Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Pengbo Wang, Zengkuan Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Immunoexpression of E-cadherin, CD44 and Claudin 7 in gastric adenocarcinomas.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pengbo WangRadiotherapy Department I, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China.
Zengkuan ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital · CNYantaishan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral recent studies have investigated the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) in pancreatic cancer; however, conclusions from these studies remain inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of E-cadherin expression on the prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of pancreatic cancer.

methodsEmbase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched to identify articles associated with E-cadherin and pancreatic cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and summarized. All eligible studies were searched until May 20, 2020. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Chi-square test and I

resultsOverall, 25 studies were identified, of which 12 reports with 1,032 cases concerned the prognosis of pancreatic cancer, and 22 involved the risk and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer. The overall results revealed that E-cadherin expression was significantly related to overall survival, gender, tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, and risk of pancreatic cancer. In the subgroup analysis, no significant heterogeneity or publication bias was observed.

conclusionsE-cadherin expression is strongly associated with the risk, clinical features, and prognosis of pancreatic cancer, suggesting that E-cadherin may be an effective biomarker for the clinical assessments and predicting prognosis of pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

E-cadherinmeta-analysispancreatic cancerprognosissusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID33912451
PMCPMC8074677
OpenAlexW3153261159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.