ArticleSocial and personality psychology compass2019
Moving beyond categorization to understand affective influences on real world health decisions.
Article in Social and personality psychology compass, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thinking, Feeling, Choosing: How Affect Is Reflected in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Making-A Qualitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- The hedonic expectancy gap: a framework for understanding intention failure in precontemplation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Frequentist, Bayesian Analysis and Complementary Statistical Tools for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Fields: Are Traditional Null-Hypothesis Significance Testing Methods Sufficient?Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
- Does sadness bring myopia: an intertemporal choice experiment with college students.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Can social media promote vaccination? Strategies and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine popularization on Chinese Weibo.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Synergistic Opportunities for Affective Science and Behavior Change.Affective science · 2023Article
- Opportunities for theory-informed decision science in cancer control.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- What Drives Preventive Health Behavior During a Global Pandemic? Emotion and Worry.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2021Article
- An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021Article
- Do cognition and emotion matter? A study of COVID-19 vaccination decision-making in college students.Health psychology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of affect and health decision-making research, with a focus on identifying gaps, opportunities, and challenges to guide future research. We begin by defining common categorical distinctions of affective processes that influence health decisions: integral (i.e., related to the decision) and incidental (i.e., normatively unrelated to the decision) influences, and current (experienced in the moment) and anticipated ("cognitive representations" of future affect) affect. We then summarize key discoveries within the most common categories of affective influences on health decision making: current integral affect, current incidental affect, and anticipated integral affect. Finally, we highlight research gaps, challenges, and opportunities for future directions for research aimed at translating affective and decision science theory to improve our understanding of, and ability to intervene upon, health decision making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.