Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33912218›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

GADTI: Graph Autoencoder Approach for DTI Prediction From Heterogeneous Network.

Zhixian Liu, Qingfeng Chen, Wei Lan, Haiming Pan, Xinkun Hao, Shirui Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MultiKD-DTA: Enhancing Drug-Target Affinity Prediction Through Multiscale Feature Extraction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A brief review of protein-ligand interaction prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhixian LiuSchool of Medical, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Qingfeng ChenSchool of Computer, Electronic and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Wei LanSchool of Computer, Electronic and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Haiming PanSchool of Computer, Electronic and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Xinkun HaoSchool of Computer, Electronic and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Shirui PanDepartment of Data Science and AI, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying drug-target interaction (DTI) is the basis for drug development. However, the method of using biochemical experiments to discover drug-target interactions has low coverage and high costs. Many computational methods have been developed to predict potential drug-target interactions based on known drug-target interactions, but the accuracy of these methods still needs to be improved. In this article, a graph autoencoder approach for DTI prediction (GADTI) was proposed to discover potential interactions between drugs and targets using a heterogeneous network, which integrates diverse drug-related and target-related datasets. Its encoder consists of two components: a graph convolutional network (GCN) and a random walk with restart (RWR). And the decoder is DistMult, a matrix factorization model, using embedding vectors from encoder to discover potential DTIs. The combination of GCN and RWR can provide nodes with more information through a larger neighborhood, and it can also avoid over-smoothing and computational complexity caused by multi-layer message passing. Based on the 10-fold cross-validation, we conduct three experiments in different scenarios. The results show that GADTI is superior to the baseline methods in both the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and the area under the precision-recall curve. In addition, based on the latest Drugbank dataset (V5.1.8), the case study shows that 54.8% of new approved DTIs are predicted by GADTI.

Indexed as

autoencoderdrug-target interaction predictiongraph convolutional networkheterogeneous networknetwork embeddingrandom walk

Identifiers

PMID33912218
PMCPMC8072283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.