Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33912111›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Outdoor Office Work - An Interactive Research Project Showing the Way Out.

Charlotte Petersson Troije, Ebba Lisberg Jensen, Cecilia Stenfors, Christina Bodin Danielsson, Eva Hoff, Fredrika Mårtensson, Susanna Toivanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Greenspace as Workplace: Benefits, Challenges and Essentialities in the Physical Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte Petersson TroijeDepartment of Urban Studies, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Ebba Lisberg JensenDepartment of Urban Studies, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Cecilia StenforsDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina Bodin DanielssonSchool of Architecture, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva HoffDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrika MårtenssonDepartment of People and Society, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Susanna ToivanenSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Sociology, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical boundaries of office work have become increasingly flexible. Work is conducted at multiple locations outside the office, such as at clients' premises, at home, in cafés, or when traveling. However, the boundary between indoor and outdoor environment seems to be strong and normative regarding how office work is performed. The aim of this study was to explore how office work may be conducted outdoors, understanding how it is being experienced by office employees and identifying its contextual preconditions. Based on a two-year interactive research project, the study was conducted together with a Swedish municipality. Fifty-eight participants engaged in the collaborative learning process, including 40 half-day workshops and reflective group discussions, co-interviews, and participants' independent experimentation of bringing work activities outdoors. Data was collected via interviews, group discussions and a custom-made mobile application. The results showed that a wide range of work activities could be done outdoors, both individually and in collaboration with others. Outdoor work activities were associated with many positive experiences by contributing to a sense of well-being, recovery, autonomy, enhanced cognition, better communication, and social relations, but also with feelings of guilt and illegitimacy. Conditions of importance for outdoor office work to happen and function well were found in the physical environment, where proximity to urban greenspaces stood out as important, but also in the sociocultural and organizational domains. Of crucial importance was managers' attitudes, as well as the overall organizational culture on this idea of bringing office work outdoors. To conclude, if working life is to benefit from outdoor office work, leaders, urban planners and policymakers need to collaborate and show the way out.

Indexed as

human nature interactionsinteractive researchoutdoor office worksustainable working lifeurban greenspaceswork norms

Identifiers

PMID33912111
PMCPMC8072124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.