Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33912001›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

A Simple and Effective Way to Study Executive Functions by Using 360° Videos.

Francesca Borgnis, Francesca Baglio, Elisa Pedroli, Federica Rossetto, Giuseppe Riva, Pietro Cipresso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca BorgnisIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Francesca BaglioIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Elisa PedroliApplied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.
Federica RossettoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe RivaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Pietro CipressoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITUniversità degli Studi eCampus · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive dysfunctions constitute a significant public health problem due to their high impact on everyday life and personal independence. Therefore, the identification of early strategies to assess and rehabilitate these impairments appears to be a priority. The ecological limitations of traditional neuropsychological tests and the numerous difficulties in administering tests in real-life scenarios have led to the increasing use of virtual reality (VR) and 360° environment-based tools for assessing executive functions (EFs) in real life. This perspective aims at proposing the development and implementation of Executive-functions Innovative Tool 360° (EXIT 360°), an innovative, enjoyable, and ecologically valid tool for a multidimensional and multicomponent evaluation of executive dysfunctions. EXIT 360° allows a complete and integrated executive functioning assessment through an original task for EFs delivered

Indexed as

360° environmentsassessmentEEGexecutive functionseye trackermachine learningneurological disease

Identifiers

PMID33912001
PMCPMC8072005
OpenAlexW3152803023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.