ReviewSaudi journal of biological sciences2021
Stress cardiomyopathy: Medical studies and extensive review.
Review in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress cardiomyopathy (SC) was first reported in the year 1983. It is narrated as critical but quite commutative left ventricular (LV) malfunction mostly caused by poignant or psychological disorder. Numerous variations of SC have been described as well as reverse stress cardiomyopathy (rSC) which is an adaptation identified by the decreased muscle movement related with hyperkinesis that reconciles impetuously. The signature of rSC is a medical demonstration alike to syndrome by an acute coronary, with no obvious difficult coronary artery disease. The occurrence of SC is approximated to be 4% of all victims conferring with gleaned syndrome by acute coronary. The portion of victims conferring with the rSC transfiguration out of all SC patients has been inconstant, varying from 1 to 24%. Reverse stress cardiomyopathy cases are found to be common with young people, less decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and more neurological disease compared to the SC. While the correct phenomenon of rSC is undetermined, postulated methods comprises of coronary microvasculature impairment, coronary artery spasm, and estrogen deficiency. Patients with rSC typically suffer with chest pain after an emotional or Psychological stressful event. The rSC can also be happened by general anesthesia, or neurological conditions. The diagnosis of rSC demands the presence of new electrocardiogram (EKG) abnormalities or elevated cardiac troponin, and absence of obstructive coronary disease, pheochromocytoma, or myocarditis. The consideration of rSC is quite analogous to that of SC, which is predominantly supportive with the treatment of complications. The recrudescence rate of rSC is around 12%. The most frequent complications of rSC include pericardial effusions, and development of LV thrombi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.