ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2020
Assessment of Level of Patient Satisfaction after Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Referral Hospitals in Addis Ababa.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBenign Prostatic hyperplasia is a very common problem in aging men. TURP comprises 95% of all surgical procedures and is the treatment of choice for prostates sized between 30ml and 80-100ml. Open surgery is the treatment of choice for large glands (bigger than 80-100ml) and for those with associated complications that have indication for open surgery. Many literatures show that the overall patient satisfaction rate and clinical outcome of TURP for BPH are very good. The objective of this study was 'assessing the level of patient satisfaction after undergoing TURP and TVP for BPH.
methodsIn this research, convenient sampling technique was used. The study design was prospective cohort study. Standardized questioner was prepared in English and later translated into Amharic. Information about demographic characteristics, preoperative data, intraoperative data, and immediate postoperative data were taken while the patient was in the hospital. At the first and the third months after the prostatectomy, patients were inquired on their level of satisfaction about their disease specific satisfaction on the urinary function and their sexual function. We used HCAHPS Measure of Patient Satisfaction Tool, to collect data and analyzed using SPSS version 18.
resultsA total of 89 patients were enrolled in the study among which 65.2% had undergone TURP. The rate of major perioperative complication was found to be low. Over half of the patients had postoperative hospital stay of three or less days. Majority of the patients were satisfied with the care given by the nurses (68.2%) and doctors (84.3%) with relatively higher physicians' care satisfaction level. More than 60% of the patients were highly satisfied with their urinary surgical outcome. With regard to hospital environment, around 60% of the patients reported that they were very satisfied with cleanliness of the rooms, bath rooms and the quietness of the rooms at night.
conclusionsBoth TURP and TVP have high level of patient satisfaction associated with low perioperative major complications. Therefore both can be recommended for patients with clear indications for prostatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.