Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33911532›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2019

Comparative Measurement of Biophysical Parameters in Consideration of Skin Graft Donor Site for Nasal Defects.

Joo-Hak Kim, Chang Hwan Ahn, Sungmin Kim, Young Lee, Sang-Ha Oh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joo-Hak KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9244-0940
Chang Hwan AhnDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4182-3823
Sungmin KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3156-7133
Young LeeDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9205-1785
Sang-Ha OhDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-5005
Chungnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn planning a skin graft, the texture, color, and size of the recipient and donor site tissues should be considered.

objectiveWe determined the optimal donor sites for nasal full-thickness skin grafting based on biophysical parameters.

methodsThirty women over the age of 60 were selected for this study. Four recipient sites (nasal root, dorsum, tip, ala) and three donor sites (preauricle, postauricle, forehead) were considered. Biophysical parameters such as transepidermal water loss (TEWL), capacitance, sebum output, erythema/melanin value, and skin replica technique were tested.

resultsThe nasal root was correlated with the forehead in terms of TEWL and sebum output. The nasal dorsum was correlated with the preauricle in terms of TEWL, erythema/melanin value, and skin replica measurements. The nasal tip was correlated with the preauricle in terms of TEWL, sebum output, erythema/melanin value, and skin replica measurements. The ala was correlated with the forehead in terms of TEWL and skin replica measurements.

conclusionThe preauricule is the optimal donor site for resurfacing of the nasal dorsum and tip. The forehead is a good donor site for alar defects. For resurfacing of the nasal root, the forehead and postauricle are good choices.

Indexed as

Face/physiologyNoseSkin transplantation

Identifiers

PMID33911532
PMCPMC7992696
OpenAlexW2909918401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.