Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33911161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Differential root and shoot magnetoresponses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Ivan A Paponov, Judith Fliegmann, Ravishankar Narayana, Massimo E Maffei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Avian cryptochrome 4 binds superoxide.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. 14-3-3 Proteins and the Plasma Membrane HPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacterial Volatiles (mVOC) Emitted by the PhytopathogenAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-Time Oxygen Localization in Electron Transfer Flavoprotein.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Geomagnetic Field (GMF)-Dependent Modulation of Iron-Sulfur Interplay inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ivan A Paponov *Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2138-0722
Judith Fliegmann *ZMBP Center for Plant Molecular Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-8006
Ravishankar NarayanaCitrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, USA.
Massimo E MaffeiPlant Physiology Unit, Department Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. massimo.maffei@unito.it.
Aarhus University · DKFlorida Department of Citrus · USUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The geomagnetic field (GMF) is one of the environmental stimuli that plants experience continuously on Earth; however, the actions of the GMF on plants are poorly understood. Here, we carried out a time-course microarray experiment to identify genes that are differentially regulated by the GMF in shoot and roots. We also used qPCR to validate the activity of some genes selected from the microarray analysis in a dose-dependent magnetic field experiment. We found that the GMF regulated genes in both shoot and roots, suggesting that both organs can sense the GMF. However, 49% of the genes were regulated in a reverse direction in these organs, meaning that the resident signaling networks define the up- or downregulation of specific genes. The set of GMF-regulated genes strongly overlapped with various stress-responsive genes, implicating the involvement of one or more common signals, such as reactive oxygen species, in these responses. The biphasic dose response of GMF-responsive genes indicates a hormetic response of plants to the GMF. At present, no evidence exists to indicate any evolutionary advantage of plant adaptation to the GMF; however, plants can sense and respond to the GMF using the signaling networks involved in stress responses.

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant RootsPlant ShootsTranscriptomeArabidopsis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33911161
PMCPMC8080623
OpenAlexW3158679283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.