Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33911100›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

A randomised clinical trial comparing 35 Hz versus 50 Hz frequency stimulation effects on hand motor recovery in older adults after stroke.

Trinidad Sentandreu-Mañó, José M Tomás, J Ricardo Salom Terrádez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07617311 (The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Spasticity), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07617311 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Spasticity: A Single-Subject Experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIzmir Katip Celebi UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled4ConditionsPost-Stroke SpasticityArmsNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trinidad Sentandreu-MañóDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia, 46610, Valencia, Spain. trinidad.sentandreu@uv.es.
José M TomásDepartment of Methodology for the Behavioral Sciences, University of Valencia, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
J Ricardo Salom TerrádezPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Doctor Peset University Hospital, 46017, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More solid data are needed regarding the application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the paretic hand following a stroke. A randomised clinical trial was conducted to compare the effects of two NMES protocols with different stimulation frequencies on upper limb motor impairment and function in older adults with spastic hemiparesis after stroke. Sixty nine outpatients were randomly assigned to the control group or the experimental groups (NMES with 50 Hz or 35 Hz). Outcome measures included motor impairment tests and functional assessment. They were collected at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and after a follow-up period. NMES groups showed significant changes (p < 0.05) with different effect sizes in range of motion, grip and pinch strength, the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the muscle electrical activity in the extensors of the wrist. The 35 Hz NMES intervention showed a significant effect on Barthel Index. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the groups in the Box and Block Test. Both NMES protocols proved evidence of improvements in measurements related to hand motor recovery in older adults following a stroke, nevertheless, these findings showed that the specific stimulation frequency had different effects depending on the clinical measures under study.

Indexed as

AgedElectric Stimulation TherapyElectromyographyFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularStrokeTreatment OutcomeWrist

Identifiers

PMID33911100
PMCPMC8080700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.