Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33911099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Finite element analysis of femoral neck strains during stair ascent and descent.

Chen Deng, Jason C Gillette, Timothy R Derrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Periprosthetic fracture following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: is a cemented stem protective?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chen DengDivision of Sport Biomechanics, School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China. dengchen@bsu.edu.cn.
Jason C Gillette *Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Timothy R Derrick *Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Iowa State University · USBeijing Sport University · CN

Funding

Chinese Universities Scientific Fund 2020063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For older population, a better understanding of the hip joint loading environment is needed for the prevention of hip pain, and the reduction of the stress fractures and fall risks. Using the motion analysis and inverse dynamics methods, combined with musculoskeletal modelling, static optimization, and finite element (FE) femur model, the difference of femoral neck strains between stair ascent vs. descent, young vs. older populations was compared. A two-way repeated-measures MANOVA was applied to test the effect of age and stair direction on the femoral neck strains. The strains at the femoral neck cross-section were greater for stair descent than ascent for both age groups (mostly P = 0.001 to 0006) but there was no difference between age groups. In this study, femoral neck strains represented bone loading environment in more direct ways than joint reaction forces/moments or joint contact forces, the risk of hip pain, falls and stress fractures might be greater during stair descent than ascent. Possible preventative methods to reduce these risks should be developed in the future studies.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFemur NeckFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicStair ClimbingTensile StrengthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33911099
PMCPMC8080611
OpenAlexW3157494247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.