Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33910907›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

The evolution of mammalian brain size.

J B Smaers, R S Rothman, D R Hudson, A M Balanoff, B Beatty, D K N Dechmann, D de Vries, J C Dunn, J G Fleagle, C C Gilbert and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Socioecological complexity in primate groups and its cognitive correlates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Shelf-invading low-oxygen waters control Cenozoic organic carbon burial rates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Brain structure and function in Homo naledi.Brain structure & function · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Parental investment and body temperature explain encephalization in vertebrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Revised Body Mass Estimates for Extinct Lemurs.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Why did the human brain size evolve? A way forward.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

J B SmaersDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. jeroen.smaers@stonybrook.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1741-9839
R S RothmanInterdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8985-6168
D R HudsonInterdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-1412
A M BalanoffDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-3818
B BeattyNYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-0041
D K N DechmannDepartment of Migration, Max-Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0043-8267
D de VriesEcosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6809-0052
J C DunnDivision of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3487-6513
J G FleagleDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3162-808X
C C GilbertNYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8768-3171
A GoswamiDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
A N IwaniukDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K-3M4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-3655
W L JungersDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
M KerneyBehavioral Ecology Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4996-3839
D T KsepkaBruce Museum, Greenwich, CT 06830, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3020-6803
P R MangerSchool of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-2854
C S MongleDivision of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
F J RohlfDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0522-3679
N A SmithDivision of Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0990-3594
C SoligoDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5448-9612
V WeisbeckerCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2370-4046
K SafiDepartment of Migration, Max-Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8418-6759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relative brain size has long been considered a reflection of cognitive capacities and has played a fundamental role in developing core theories in the life sciences. Yet, the notion that relative brain size validly represents selection on brain size relies on the untested assumptions that brain-body allometry is restrained to a stable scaling relationship across species and that any deviation from this slope is due to selection on brain size. Using the largest fossil and extant dataset yet assembled, we find that shifts in allometric slope underpin major transitions in mammalian evolution and are often primarily characterized by marked changes in body size. Our results reveal that the largest-brained mammals achieved large relative brain sizes by highly divergent paths. These findings prompt a reevaluation of the traditional paradigm of relative brain size and open new opportunities to improve our understanding of the genetic and developmental mechanisms that influence brain size.

Identifiers

PMID33910907
PMCPMC8081360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.