Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33910838›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Therapeutic and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Toshihiro Uemura, Taigo Kato, Akira Nagahara, Atsunari Kawashima, Koji Hatano, Takeshi Ujike, Yusuke Ono, Hiroki Higashihara, Kazutoshi Fujita, Shinichiro Fukuhara and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Toshihiro UemuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Taigo KatoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; kato@uro.med.oaska-u.ac.jp.
Akira NagaharaDepartment of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Atsunari KawashimaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koji HatanoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi UjikeDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke OnoDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroki HigashiharaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shinichiro FukuharaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi KiuchiDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ryoichi ImamuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Noriyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Norio NonomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Motohide UemuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC), very few studies have compared oncological outcomes and renal function preservation rates in nephron-sparing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 126 patients with cT1 RCC treated with RAPN (n=78) and computed tomography-guided PCA (n=48) between March 2016 and November 2019. Clinical data and outcomes were compared for the two groups.

resultsThere were no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates in the two groups (p=0.17 and p=0.093, respectively). The median percentage of estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation at 6 months after surgery was 91.8% and 91.4% in the RAPN and PCA groups, respectively (p=0.9).

conclusionIn patients with cT1a RCC, oncological outcomes and renal function appear similar following RAPN and PCA.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCryosurgeryKidney NeoplasmsRoboticsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCryoablationrenal cell carcinomarenal functionrobot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID33910838
PMCPMC8193303
OpenAlexW3159721248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.