Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33910606›Full record

ReviewPlant methods2021

Computer vision-based wood identification and its expansion and contribution potentials in wood science: A review.

Sung-Wook Hwang, Junji Sugiyama

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. SmartWoodID-an image collection of large end-grain surfaces to support wood identification systems.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Wood identification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sung-Wook HwangGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan.
Junji SugiyamaGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan. sugiyama.junji.6m@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-4925
Kyoto University · JPNanjing Forestry University · CN

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science H1805485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable developments in computer vision and machine learning have changed the methodologies of many scientific disciplines. They have also created a new research field in wood science called computer vision-based wood identification, which is making steady progress towards the goal of building automated wood identification systems to meet the needs of the wood industry and market. Nevertheless, computer vision-based wood identification is still only a small area in wood science and is still unfamiliar to many wood anatomists. To familiarize wood scientists with the artificial intelligence-assisted wood anatomy and engineering methods, we have reviewed the published mainstream studies that used or developed machine learning procedures. This review could help researchers understand computer vision and machine learning techniques for wood identification and choose appropriate techniques or strategies for their study objectives in wood science.

Indexed as

Computer visionConvolutional neural networksDeep learningImage recognitionMachine learningWood anatomyWood identification

Identifiers

PMID33910606
PMCPMC8082842
OpenAlexW3157931840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.