Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33910554›Full record

ReviewBMC oral health2021

Challenges in identifying indigenous peoples in population oral health surveys: a commentary.

Lisa Jamieson, Joanne Hedges, Marco A Peres, Carol C Guarnizo-Herreño, João L Bastos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Measuring Māori Health, Wellbeing, and Disability in Aotearoa Using a Web-Based Survey Methodology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa JamiesonAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, University of Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. lisa.jamieson@adelaide.edu.au.
Joanne HedgesAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, University of Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Marco A PeresNational Dental Research Institute Singapore, 5 Second Hospital Ave, Singapore, 168938, Singapore.
Carol C Guarnizo-HerreñoDepartamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
João L BastosPost-Graduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently 370 million persons identifying as indigenous across 90 countries globally. Indigenous peoples generally face substantial exclusion/marginalization and poorer health status compared with non-indigenous majority populations; this includes poorer oral health status and reduced access to dental services. Population-level oral health surveys provide data to set priorities, inform policies, and monitor progress in dental disease experience/dental service utilisation over time. Rigorously and comprehensively measuring the oral health burden of indigenous populations is an ethical issue, though, given that survey instruments and sampling procedures are usually not sufficiently inclusive. This results in substantial underestimation or even biased estimation of dental disease rates and severity among indigenous peoples, making it difficult for policy makers to prioritise resources in this area. The methodological challenges identified include: (1) suboptimal identification of indigenous populations; (2) numerator-denominator bias and; (3) statistical analytic considerations. We suggest solutions that can be implemented to strengthen the visibility of indigenous peoples around the world in an oral health context. These include acknowledgment of the need to engage indigenous peoples with all data-related processes, encouraging the use of indigenous identifiers in national and regional data sets, and mitigating and/or carefully assessing biases inherent in population oral health methodologies for indigenous peoples.

Indexed as

Oral HealthPopulation GroupsHealth StatusHumansIndigenous PeoplesIdentificationIndigenousSurveys

Identifiers

PMID33910554
PMCPMC8082663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.